In the case of a license suspension, which option is NOT typically considered by the Board?

In the context of license suspension determinations by the Board, the correct answer highlights that a change of ownership is not typically a factor considered. License suspensions are generally more focused on the individual or entity's conduct and compliance with professional standards, rather than administrative or business ownership structures.

Persistent unethical behavior, non-payment of licensing fees, and public complaints all represent significant concerns regarding professional practice and ethical standards. They are direct indicators of how a licensee is engaging with their responsibilities and the public. Persistent unethical behavior suggests a lack of integrity or adherence to professional standards, while non-payment of fees indicates a disregard for the legal and regulatory obligations tied to maintaining a license. Public complaints can reveal serious issues regarding service or conduct, making them critical for the Board to consider during suspension evaluations.

In contrast, a change of ownership does not inherently reflect the conduct or ethics of an individual licensee. Ownership can shift for various reasons that may not affect the qualifications or ethical practices of existing licensed individuals. Thus, while change of ownership can impact business operations, it is not a direct reflection of the licensee's professional behavior or compliance with the applicable laws and regulations.